<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flow FTP Review &#8211; Site Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2010/03/05/flow-ftp-review-site-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2010/03/05/flow-ftp-review-site-stats/</link>
	<description>All Mac, All the Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2010/03/05/flow-ftp-review-site-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-76707</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/?p=2654#comment-76707</guid>
		<description>Some documentation is always a good idea - however, I had zero problems using it and I think the interface is very intuitive and within a short time one has figured out everything. Great program, but seems to have a bit of a problem with large concurrent downloads of multiple big folders. That said, I like it a lot, but it will have to prove whether it is a serious contender, not just in terms of design and usability, but also technically. So, if anything can point me to a serious review and comparison that explores the limits of each (Flow, Transmit, Captain and the like)  please let me know. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some documentation is always a good idea &#8211; however, I had zero problems using it and I think the interface is very intuitive and within a short time one has figured out everything. Great program, but seems to have a bit of a problem with large concurrent downloads of multiple big folders. That said, I like it a lot, but it will have to prove whether it is a serious contender, not just in terms of design and usability, but also technically. So, if anything can point me to a serious review and comparison that explores the limits of each (Flow, Transmit, Captain and the like)  please let me know. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2010/03/05/flow-ftp-review-site-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-76642</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/?p=2654#comment-76642</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s the case, I&#039;m sorry I couldn&#039;t provide that information for you. 

Have you contacted Brian at ExtendedMac and let him know this serious shortcoming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s the case, I&#8217;m sorry I couldn&#8217;t provide that information for you. </p>
<p>Have you contacted Brian at ExtendedMac and let him know this serious shortcoming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2010/03/05/flow-ftp-review-site-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-76641</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/?p=2654#comment-76641</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s because Flow lacks even rudimentary documentation on how to get started. Every (and I&#039;ll bet every) purchaser of that bundle is out here wondering how in hell to get the damned thing to work. How &#039;bout just a little fucking hint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s because Flow lacks even rudimentary documentation on how to get started. Every (and I&#8217;ll bet every) purchaser of that bundle is out here wondering how in hell to get the damned thing to work. How &#8217;bout just a little fucking hint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

