<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mecca &#8211; Another New Browser for Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2008/06/15/mecca-another-new-browser-for-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2008/06/15/mecca-another-new-browser-for-mac/</link>
	<description>All Mac, All the Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2008/06/15/mecca-another-new-browser-for-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-33569</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 05:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2008/06/15/mecca-another-new-browser-for-mac/#comment-33569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It looks good, but i still have to say. i think latitude looks much cleaner/nicer. i’m going to try mecca but if latitude is all that i hope it will be, it will definitely be my main browser&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree.  Latitude seems to offer more innovative features.  I like the interface shown here in Mecca, but it almost seems like a bad photoshop job, and one that could be just a Safari skin.

However, competition never hurts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It looks good, but i still have to say. i think latitude looks much cleaner/nicer. i’m going to try mecca but if latitude is all that i hope it will be, it will definitely be my main browser</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree.  Latitude seems to offer more innovative features.  I like the interface shown here in Mecca, but it almost seems like a bad photoshop job, and one that could be just a Safari skin.</p>
<p>However, competition never hurts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2008/06/15/mecca-another-new-browser-for-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-33568</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 05:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2008/06/15/mecca-another-new-browser-for-mac/#comment-33568</guid>
		<description>It looks good, but i still have to say. i think latitude looks much cleaner/nicer. i&#039;m going to try mecca but if latitude is all that i hope it will be, it will definitely be my main browser</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks good, but i still have to say. i think latitude looks much cleaner/nicer. i&#8217;m going to try mecca but if latitude is all that i hope it will be, it will definitely be my main browser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

