<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Office 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2007/01/10/mac-office-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2007/01/10/mac-office-2008/</link>
	<description>All Mac, All the Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2007/01/10/mac-office-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2007/01/10/mac-office-2008/#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>The problem is that Microsoft isn&#039;t Apple. Whereas Apple starts with a strong, simple application with a strong and simple interface and slowly adds features over the years, Microsoft has found itself in a pickle because it&#039;s applications have become bloated. Now, they want to do it differently and millions upon millions of users will hate it. People always say that Apple&#039;s applications, on version 1.0, are lame, nothing compared to a M$ equivalent, and will fail. But, over the years, look where iTunes is? I remember version 1.0. It didn&#039;t do a lot but wow did it look great. It&#039;s MAIN feature was an easy, simple, interface. 8 Years later the interface is more complex, but it really hasn&#039;t changed. The biggest change is the three new views in version 7.0. Same with Mac OS X. It was nothing compared to to OS 9 when it came out, but I sure loved the simplicity of it. The iPhone will be the same way. For a little while, it will be Apple-only applications. Then Apple will probably partner with M$ when the iPhone is huge and offer software for it like they offer iPod Games, via the iTunes Store.Â </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Microsoft isn&#8217;t Apple. Whereas Apple starts with a strong, simple application with a strong and simple interface and slowly adds features over the years, Microsoft has found itself in a pickle because it&#8217;s applications have become bloated. Now, they want to do it differently and millions upon millions of users will hate it. People always say that Apple&#8217;s applications, on version 1.0, are lame, nothing compared to a M$ equivalent, and will fail. But, over the years, look where iTunes is? I remember version 1.0. It didn&#8217;t do a lot but wow did it look great. It&#8217;s MAIN feature was an easy, simple, interface. 8 Years later the interface is more complex, but it really hasn&#8217;t changed. The biggest change is the three new views in version 7.0. Same with Mac OS X. It was nothing compared to to OS 9 when it came out, but I sure loved the simplicity of it. The iPhone will be the same way. For a little while, it will be Apple-only applications. Then Apple will probably partner with M$ when the iPhone is huge and offer software for it like they offer iPod Games, via the iTunes Store.Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2007/01/10/mac-office-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2007/01/10/mac-office-2008/#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been a big fan of office either, but from what I can tell, this new version looks like it&#039;s been beaten with an ugly-stick.

I watched part of this demo at Macworld, and it&#039;s just too much. Microsoft just doesn&#039;t get it. They&#039;ve even tried to add some of the Mac effects, but it&#039;s clear they had no idea what to do with them. For example, the screen shot above has a little blue button in the lower left corner. When that button is clicked, a tiny little &quot;ripple&quot; effect happens within the button. I just have to ask, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been a big fan of office either, but from what I can tell, this new version looks like it&#8217;s been beaten with an ugly-stick.</p>
<p>I watched part of this demo at Macworld, and it&#8217;s just too much. Microsoft just doesn&#8217;t get it. They&#8217;ve even tried to add some of the Mac effects, but it&#8217;s clear they had no idea what to do with them. For example, the screen shot above has a little blue button in the lower left corner. When that button is clicked, a tiny little &#8220;ripple&#8221; effect happens within the button. I just have to ask, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
