Comments on: Look at Firefox 3, Rendering Updates with Cairo Graphics Framework http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2006/12/13/look-at-firefox-3-rendering-updates-with-cairo-graphics-framework/ All Mac, All the Time Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:44:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Matt http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2006/12/13/look-at-firefox-3-rendering-updates-with-cairo-graphics-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-4266 Matt Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:53:40 +0000 http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2006/12/13/look-at-firefox-3-rendering-updates-with-cairo-graphics-framework/#comment-4266 Sorry if you found the above confusing. I use Camino, which is based on Gecko, just like Firefox. I like the browser, but the rendering isn't always perfect for the same reasons that Firefox hasn't performed perfectly. Safari is based on another rendering engine and has passed the above-mentioned test. I just don't care for that browser as much. Firefox 3 should fix the rendering issues and those improvements should trickle down to Camino as well. Sorry if you found the above confusing. I use Camino, which is based on Gecko, just like Firefox. I like the browser, but the rendering isn’t always perfect for the same reasons that Firefox hasn’t performed perfectly.

Safari is based on another rendering engine and has passed the above-mentioned test. I just don’t care for that browser as much.

Firefox 3 should fix the rendering issues and those improvements should trickle down to Camino as well.

]]> By: Doug Bromley http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2006/12/13/look-at-firefox-3-rendering-updates-with-cairo-graphics-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-4120 Doug Bromley Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:45:13 +0000 http://www.macfanatic.net/blog/2006/12/13/look-at-firefox-3-rendering-updates-with-cairo-graphics-framework/#comment-4120 You rubbish the Gecko engine then conclude you like using Camino - which uses the Gecko engine? Okay. Perhaps some clarification? You rubbish the Gecko engine then conclude you like using Camino – which uses the Gecko engine?

Okay. Perhaps some clarification?

]]>